|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,707
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Sep 20th, 2026
|
|
|
6 members (ewest, CentexSaj, Jim Thompson, WindowRock, Sunil, FireIsHot),
2,730
guests, and
488
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,001 Likes: 1499
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,001 Likes: 1499 |
Norm - Some types of invertebrates are much better at colonizing new waters than others. Some of the early colonization is due to the proximity of a nearby water body. Many invertebrates to name a few, clams and snails, are sometimes very slow at colonizing new waters. Some invertebrates get introduced but do not establish themselves either short or long term for one reason or another. Sometimes in new water bodies the early colonists have low diversity compared to old established waters. Inflowing stream water is responsible for higher diversities in a lot of new waters. Isolated relatively new water often has high abundances but low diversity.
I am not sure why terrestrial colonization is slower, if it truly is. Is there proof of this? Maybe I misread your last question. Are you talking about, why is it more diffcicult for aquatic species to colonize land habitats vs aquatic habitats? or colonization in general?
aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine - America's Journal of Pond Management
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|