|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,695
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 03:05 AM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 2,387 Likes: 643
|
|
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 2,387 Likes: 643 |
TBH, I wouldn't cash out just yet.. There's other ways this can happen, it may not be the balancing act that Lusk mentioned but you can still start a fishery. One thing I would consider is reproduction being inhibited by an out of balance forage population and with this you'll have good growth out of initial predator stock. This can go 2 ways, 1 being stunted LMB because of an overabundance of smaller BG that don't achieve the sizes needed for suitable return. 2 being a case where predators stocked have a large number of BG that stay ahead of them in proper sizes needed but that may be harder to balance than Bob's recommendation. I see nehunter stating that "had he gone with State recommendations..." I don't deal much with NE biologists or their theories other than Percids so I don't know what they would recommend but I'll suggest an option. 3-5lbs FHM/acre 150-175 3-5" BG/acre 50-60 4-6" LMB/acre spring of next year. In TX those yr 1 fish may be 8-12" which some of those Bass would catch up and start cleaning a few of the smaller original stockers before yrs end but the next year class of BG will be growing fast. This would be something similar to a recommended stocking in my location but fish don't grow the same here for obvious reasons but I can't help but think you could get a good start with similar numbers.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|