|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,695
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
0 members (),
8,194
guests, and
163
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,033 Likes: 483
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014  Lunker
|
|
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014  Lunker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,033 Likes: 483 |
Nice article. It has to be read very carefully. It is cutting edge but something 99% of pond owners can't do (effectively manage the N/P ratio to produce optimum good plankton blooms).
The reason pond fertilizers are high in P and not N is based on years of water chemistry science and reality. Most non-productive ponds (those that need added fertility) have low to no P and it is the limiting nutrient factor. Without adding P no or minimal blooms will occur. Just like with alkalinity (low alkalinity = no bloom) as alkalinity is the limiting factor. You can add all the N and/or P you want and still not get a bloom.
What is needed is the right ratio of N & P and good alkalinity plus the right plankton species present. In providing advice I try to never let perfect be the enemy of improving the existing situation. The question here is - if you have non/minimally productive waters (no/low plankton bloom) do you accept the situation or try to improve things using available tools ? Learning to make optimal use (not no use) of the tools is what Dave's article is about.
Last edited by ewest; 06/27/19 12:37 PM.
.gif)
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|