|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,707
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
7 members (Theo Gallus, FireIsHot, Sunil, ewest, CentexSaj, Jim Thompson, WindowRock),
2,587
guests, and
402
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,883 Likes: 117
Chairman, Pond Boss Legacy award; Moderator; field correspondent Lunker
|
|
Chairman, Pond Boss Legacy award; Moderator; field correspondent Lunker
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,883 Likes: 117 |
quote=Bob Lusk]For a lake that size, stocking golden shiners may work, it may not. It depends why the bass aren't growing. If bass are overcrowded, you can stock all kinds of forage fish and it probably won't matter, especially in such a large lake.
Is this one of the Innsbruck Lakes?
@MOfisherman, this above is part of why I asked about age structure. Your "low density" may be related to other concerns. I have a lake I help with that has what appears to be "low density" numbers but loads and loads of forage. After doing some age verification, (Just finished up) we found several of our 8-10" bass were 7+ yrs old-then naturally dead-shortly after. Forage base present are good numbers of reproducing BG, BCP & WCP, Gizzard shad and a fair number of crayfish. I don't want to imply by any means what is stated in above posts is incorrect, but LMB in low numbers can't be the only thing left in your BOW. There is surely other species that should be loading the lake with biomass if LMB are low density. If not, this leads me to think in simple terms, low proper habitat-which isn't as simple as it sounds, is an issue. Macrophytes in large expanse are very important, but if fry are present in any number, of any species, with low density LMB, there should be large numbers of something else. My 2 cents are likely worth 1 cent at best compared to some of these other folks but I feel like adding more forage is not going to fix your issue. It's obviously not heavy predation that's causing it (the problem). It sounds like a lack of large amounts of proper ambush cover and a lack of (proper)nursery habitat. If the grass is terrestrial in nature, that will be short lived and an oxygen burner, if it is aquatic then things may be different. There very well could be factors involved we don't even know about, but I'm a strong believer in what we first see as a problem is usually the result of a problem we aren't looking at. This is the advice I provided him on a phone conference call - do not stock GSH rather focus budget and effort on adding dense structure [cedars] 3-6' depth to beef up the BG forage base, harvest or move low WR LMB. Also recommended improving BG density by moving adult female BG from surrounding lakes to provide a jump start. Guess he was seeking a second opinion following our consult.
Many men go fishing all of their lives without knowing that it is not fish they are after. ~ Henry David Thoreau
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|