Oh crap, Sunil is now fully engaged....

Sunil, I do admire the tenacity, arrogance, smugness, confidence, and self- righteousness that you display. I�m certain those same attributes served the likes of Nero, Napoleon, and General Custer, quite well. Right up until the day they didn�t

You need to read through the hunting thread again. I am a hunter myself, but I questioned the wisdom of removing the best genetics from a population, solely for the sake of pride or accomplishment. I guess I�m not the only one who sees only what he wishes,eh?

And just to further the record, I harbored no illusion about how this thing would shake out in the end. I figure that necessity trumps justice often enough to place my position as one precarious. Bob saying that things do not always favor a mod gives me a glimmer of hope, and I will pm him in a few hours time. Bob also mentioned that he wants the forum to be comfortable enough for children to read. I agree. It�s important for future adults to see how they should conduct themselves when inevitable disagreements arise.

Finally, you are correct in that ours is a majority rule based society, and I am in total agreement with this philosophy. I realize that it will not matter to you, but nonetheless you should know that I have received a handful of pm�s from other members offering support for my position. While still definitively a minority, it is still greater than one.... as much as you would like to make this about me alone, it isn�t.

Bob, I am taking your offer of personal communication to be a sincere one. Like you, I would like to mull it over for a spell. My hope is to communicate privately in a few hours. Until then, I am done responding to this thread.


"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"

If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.