|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,660
Members19,114
| |
Most Online13,012 Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
1 members (4CornersPuddle),
1,125
guests, and
97
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18
Ambassador Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18 |
Slow your roll boys...this idea of an aggressive panfish that doesn't get hookshy has not been the case in my situation. If you're fishing occasionally, and/or keeping what you catch with a high number of hybrids present, then okay. But under a steady regime of fishing pressure and CPR, coupled with learned behavior, (or conditioned response if it suits your palate better), AND smaller stocking quantities beneficial to growing trophy hybs, these fish get a serious case of lockjaw.
And the larger gape of a HBG should enable them to utilize natural forage too large for BG over the course of their indeterminate lifespan, provided a source of forage exists.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|