|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,695
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 19 hours ago
|
|
|
0 members (),
6,376
guests, and
138
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 342
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 342 |
I restricted the cattle off this part of the property when I saw the nest activity for 3 weeks, but needed the spring grass on that portion of the property so let them back in. I have 5 or 6 nesting areas, and the cattle seem to affect 2 of them. I also noticed that there are now more nests that are in deeper water. (4-5 feet) so maybe the fish have compensated for the negative impact of the cattle?? It isn't practical to fence the areas of the pond that are affected. The pond is about 7 years old and it has had cattle activity its entire life. One thing is certain - I have larger and more CNBG and RES than I have seen previously. Happy to say that I have not had issues with significant algae.
Thanks for your input. I am seeing another batch of new nests and will likely move the cattle off that property again for a few weeks.
"Our Life is frittered away by detail. Simplify, Simplify" -Henry David Thoreau -
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|