Originally Posted By: Sunil
Spark, one could say then that the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator if local and state issues needed to be escalated.

There really would not need to be a specific federal agency for every single category of dispute.

I'm not saying to abolish the EPA entirely, but does it need to be an "8 billion dollar" agency if it's only purpose is to resolve conflicts that couldn't be resolved at the state level?



I get you, Sunil. And I agree to a point. I do think the EPA needs to be mindful of its core mission, that being issues that cross state lines, but I also maintain there's room in there to assist with intra state policy, on some level, also. Groundwater aquifers do not respect state boundaries.

"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"

If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.