I'm in your corner, RAH. We need environmental oversight, just not to the extreme that WOTUS brought us. But in no fashion should this recent overturn be one a case of throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

And I don't believe it will, as I've said all along what one administration puts up, another can tear down. I do think a variant of WOTUS is unavoidable in our future, but I realized early on that this most recent one was providing little cause for the emotional prophecies that were foretold.

In another couple decades, things will be different. The eventual outcome is seen by me as inescapable.

"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"

If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.