|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,695
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
0 members (),
8,194
guests, and
163
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,001 Likes: 1498
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 16,001 Likes: 1498 |
Br aware that when your pond stays 62F-66F all summer the LMB-BG will not grow at average rates compared to a warm water pond. They will survive but expect slower growth. Feeding them pellets will allow the to grow the best they can in 60-66F. Consider SMB & YP as cooler water adapted fish for supplimental stocking instead of LMB-BG.
aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine - America's Journal of Pond Management
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Most efficient, Proven, recommended anti-muck?
|
DCQuarterCircle
|
01/31/17 06:22 AM
|
Re: Most efficient, Proven, recommended anti-muck?
|
MNFISH2
|
01/31/17 09:22 AM
|
Re: Most efficient, Proven, recommended anti-muck?
|
Bill Cody
|
01/31/17 04:11 PM
|
Re: Most efficient, Proven, recommended anti-muck?
|
MNFISH2
|
01/31/17 07:04 PM
|
Re: Most efficient, Proven, recommended anti-muck?
|
4CornersPuddle
|
01/31/17 05:16 PM
|
Re: Most efficient, Proven, recommended anti-muck?
|
DCQuarterCircle
|
02/04/17 07:00 PM
|
Re: Most efficient, Proven, recommended anti-muck?
|
Bill Cody
|
02/04/17 07:30 PM
|
Re: Most efficient, Proven, recommended anti-muck?
|
DCQuarterCircle
|
02/04/17 09:47 PM
|
Re: Most efficient, Proven, recommended anti-muck?
|
Bill Cody
|
02/05/17 02:22 AM
|
Re: Most efficient, Proven, recommended anti-muck?
|
wbuffetjr
|
02/05/17 01:18 PM
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|