|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,672
Members19,115
| |
Most Online13,561
|
|
|
2 members (jludwig, 10x),
6,393
guests, and
120
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,973 Likes: 1
Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,973 Likes: 1 |
Dave, I'm still kinda ticked I gave my researched literature (about 2 months worth) to the guy for a promise I would get it back plus his final thesis. I got neither after several request. The size/age was already known, but I can't remember for sure. It was something around 2 inches or less.
If done correctly you can get 100% females when subjected to proper concentrations of estrogen at the right size/age befroe they differnate their sex.
To get all female offspring you need to get sex reversed bass (original males) then cross them with (?) to produce all females. It is simple chi square genetics but I for the live of me can not think of this right now. Belive it or not still working 70 hr weeks. Scott Allen are you reading this? Figure this one out for me. Sorry for the poor memory Dave. You would think somehting you worked on for 9 months would not be that hard to remember. I feel the genetic approach is where it is headed, so you have bass that were themselves never actually treated with the estrogen.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|