|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,700
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
8 members (Theo Gallus, catscratch, J. E. Craig, gehajake, FishinRod, WindowRock, jludwig, emactxag),
3,169
guests, and
611
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,883 Likes: 117
Chairman, Pond Boss Legacy award; Moderator; field correspondent Lunker
|
|
Chairman, Pond Boss Legacy award; Moderator; field correspondent Lunker
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,883 Likes: 117 |
Pit ponds require significantly more earth removal increasing costs.
Damming a draw requires a core trench which is an added expense but typically less dirt removal than a pit pond.
A draw already demonstrates it's receiving significant water from surrounding watershed during rain events which is a plus, and I personally prefer land with some varied topography/timber.
Watershed size depends on your annual precipitation. In SE NE our formula is 33 acre watershed for every acre of pond based on 29" annual precipitation.
Hope some of this helps.
Many men go fishing all of their lives without knowing that it is not fish they are after. ~ Henry David Thoreau
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|