|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,671
Members19,115
| |
Most Online13,012 Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
6 members (Bill Cody, LeighAnn, Sunil, Theo Gallus, gehajake, rjackson),
3,923
guests, and
137
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18
Ambassador Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18 |
Now Sunil has gone and offended Chinese philosophers, women, and rambunctious squirrels all in the same post. Pretty sure the chickens have every right to be upset also, but then again I'm not really in tune with what Dave was trying to communicate there.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|