|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,663
Members19,114
| |
Most Online13,012 Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
6 members (LeighAnn, FireIsHot, Theo Gallus, Bill Cody, Sunil, Drago),
1,951
guests, and
112
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18
Ambassador Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18 |
I've been thinking for a few weeks now about the notion of absolutes. It seems to me that many aspects of fish and pond management once regarded as infallible truths may actually be open to much interpretation and implementation.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|