|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,660
Members19,114
| |
Most Online13,012
Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
2 members (Bill Cody, LeighAnn),
1,119
guests, and
91
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 149
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 149 |
Pinetar,
Doing a 10% sample of 125 or measuring every 10th one or a combination will work. Sometimes the first 10-15 is great and sometimes its not. I have a inclination that the first ones will be good representation, since you are feeding optimal.
Joshua I was thinking one every 10.. not the first 10 to 15. What do you mean "feeding optimal"?
7 Acre +/- pond. Stocked with CNBG, RESF, GS, TFS, FHM, in March - June of 2008, Stocked with 200 3" F1 Tiger Bass in March of 2010... Additional stockings of CNBG, Tilapia, FHM in May of 2011.April of 2012 and May of 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,032 Likes: 483
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014  Lunker
|
|
Moderator Hall of Fame 2014 Lunker
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,032 Likes: 483 |
I think he was referring to feeding (did not notice you were feeding another food). Try this. Measure (get data)on a representative cross section of your fish population. If 10 % are big 40 % mid size and 50 % small then measure in those %. Out of 200 fish measure 2 large ones 8 mid size and 10 smaller fish. If you want a bigger sample then double the # measured ( 4 , 16 and 20) Chart them over time.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
.gif)
