|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,679
Members19,115
| |
Most Online23,413 5 hours ago
|
|
|
0 members (),
8,875
guests, and
271
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 721
|
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 721 |
Yolk Just thinking I could same sex the LMB with a smaller Male population (first 5 were all male as I seen it). That would lead to even less chance of recruitment if a female does happen to get in. Being smaller with a smaller mouth gape would allow for the smaller BG biomass being consumed. I could just add X (undetermined) number per year to account for harvest and mortality. Could replace what is removed during the event relative ease. If I go this route It would defiantly make sure number 1 is correct and all I would need to do is determine X. How Many per acre initial and how many to remove and replace per year?
I could still monitor to see if I have any recruitment along the way.
I have used sexing in the past to influence pond population control with LMB.
Yolk Thanks again for participating
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|