We agree on the constitution. We disagree on trust in science.
Is "science" based on fact or not. Is it based on proof or not? WHO or WHOM is science? I will not have any one group, with an agenda I might add, make up my mind on what a fact of science is. I have pointed out 4 different times in the last 80 years where "science" said the sky was falling. Each time this happened the naysayers were told that they were daft. The "naysayer group" also included other scientists, odd.
I cannot find a weather site that can tell me, with a probability better than flipping a coin, what my weather will be remotely like next week. I cannot find one that will tell me what my weather will be like tomorrow, regarding precipitation, with better odds than a coin flip. The kicker is I can look outside and find the opposite weather than these weather sites actually say is happening right now LOL. With this data I am to believe that one sect of "scientists" can tell what the weather for the entire planet is going to do and why? From a group that is so certain of themselves, so specific, that they call this phenom "climate change".
I find it hard to understand why you don't respect why some would question your science. I respect your opinion but I laugh at your "facts".
