Originally Posted By: Rainman
Originally Posted By: RAH
Not being a climate scientist myself, I'll go with the folks that are, but you are free to trust whomever you want. As a scientist in another field, I trust the scientific community to base their conclusions on evidence.


That's my point, the climate scientists admitted they faked the data and manipulated historic temperatures, yet it is still "real"? I guess changing actual temperature readings is okay, when it supports a flawed "scientific conclusion". Maybe the climatologist were educated with the new math in schools today where rounding and getting close is better than an accurate answer now....


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/en...andal-ever.html



When my grandfather was on the plains of Texas with the cattle and temperatures dropped to -25 and cattle were dying he thought it was the end of the world.

During the dust bowl when it didn't rain for ~3 years and tens of thousands of cattle were dying they thought it was the end of the world.

They didn't have a "greenhouse gas" problem back then.