Not being a climate scientist myself, I'll go with the folks that are, but you are free to trust whomever you want. As a scientist in another field, I trust the scientific community to base their conclusions on evidence.
That's my point, the climate scientists admitted they faked the data and manipulated historic temperatures, yet it is still "real"? I guess changing actual temperature readings is okay, when it supports a flawed "scientific conclusion". Maybe the climatologist were educated with the new math in schools today where rounding and getting close is better than an accurate answer now....
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/en...andal-ever.html
