|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,705
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564
Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,555 Likes: 411
Moderator Lunker
|
|
Moderator Lunker
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,555 Likes: 411 |
It's not about the fish. It's about the pond. Take care of the pond and the fish will be fine. PB subscriber since before it was in color.
Without a sense of urgency, Nothing ever gets done.
Boy, if I say "sic em", you'd better look for something to bite. Sam Shelley Rancher and Farmer Muleshoe Texas 1892-1985 RIP Grandpa
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 207
|
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 207 |
If nobody had worried, they wouldn't have been checked.
I just got a new pond, I made it twice because I aint so bright.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,692
Hall of Fame 2015 Lunker
|
|
Hall of Fame 2015 Lunker
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,692 |
My worried comment was about other than this.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18
Ambassador Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18 |
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 113
|
|
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 113 |
Well . what did you expect them to say. ! Like the IRS they can do no wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 6,088 Likes: 101
|
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 6,088 Likes: 101 |
I think "concerned" (of government overreach) would be a more appropriate word, for me at least, rather than worried.
Success in trying to revoke the second amendment to the Constitution or something else of serious nature, then I would be worried.
Last edited by snrub; 12/16/15 09:56 AM.
John
I subscribe to Pond Boss Magazine
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
