Pond Boss Magazine
https://www.pondboss.com/images/userfiles/image/20130301193901_6_150by50orangewhyshouldsubscribejpeg.jpg
Advertisment
Newest Members
Kirk78, Rgv, Kalispel, TokyoTim, Mustelid
19,113 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,665
Members19,114
Most Online13,012
Jun 7th, 2026
Top Posters
esshup 29,788
ewest 22,032
Cecil Baird1 20,043
Bill Cody 15,994
Who's Online Now
5 members (FireIsHot, ewest, Theo Gallus, jludwig, LeighAnn), 1,809 guests, and 109 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Seville #430164 11/26/15 11:03 PM
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 368
T
T Offline
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 368
I've been aware of the many concerns about Roundup since the time I worked for BLM, and I've read various things on the subject in the interim. To my mind, there's plenty of reason for concern, and I choose not to use the stuff. But it's still one of the most widely used (probably the most widely used) herbicides, so it's obvious many people don't agree with my take on the subject.
http://roundupcompensation.com/
http://earthopensource.org/gmomythsandtr...easier-farmers/
http://robbwolf.com/2015/05/06/glyphosate-benign-or-dangerous/
http://www.mindfully.org/Pesticide/Roundup-Glyphosate-Factsheet-Cox.htm
http://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/glyphogen.html
http://www.pan-uk.org/pestnews/Actives/glyphosa.htm

Seville #430166 11/27/15 06:04 AM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,807
Likes: 340
R
RAH Offline
Lunker
Lunker
R Offline
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,807
Likes: 340
When I look at internet links the first thing I do is go the .edu or .gov sites. I went to the one link that you list that fits this category and it seems accurate. These types of sites cannot just write anything. Folks have many concerns that have no evidence to support them.

http://www.ufocasebook.com/alienabductions.html

As a scientist, I go with evidence over popular concerns.

Seville #430172 11/27/15 08:19 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981
Likes: 18
S
Ambassador
Lunker
Ambassador
Lunker
S Offline
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981
Likes: 18
Come now. How can one compare the supposed danger of glyphosate to the very real possibility of alien abduction? I've said it before and I'll say it again, when the science experiment that is planet Earth comes to an end, there's going to be a lot of very surprised looks on faces. grin

You know how we manipulate the environment in order to raise our fish? Yeah well, that same technique works on a much grander scale also.. laugh


"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"

If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,807
Likes: 340
R
RAH Offline
Lunker
Lunker
R Offline
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,807
Likes: 340
Alien abductions are a lot harder to disprove:) Supposed dangers of glyphosate can be tested in scientific experiments. Folks have been trying pretty hard for over 40 years to demonstrate the "dangers" of glyphosate with out much luck, but who knows what will pop up tomorrow?

RAH #430177 11/27/15 09:00 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981
Likes: 18
S
Ambassador
Lunker
Ambassador
Lunker
S Offline
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981
Likes: 18
Originally Posted By: RAH
Folks have been trying pretty hard for over 40 years to demonstrate the "dangers" of glyphosate with out much luck, but who knows what will pop up tomorrow?


I like hearing you say that. I think there are many who are content in believing today's knowledge is the ultimate and final word on a subject. I try to always keep an open mind and continue to question.


"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"

If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.
Seville #440483 03/13/16 05:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,080
Likes: 1
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,080
Likes: 1

In another thread, there is a discussion about High PH in ponds which I find a very interesting subject and I've been digging into it some. One thing I�m finding in my reading is that, although submerged pond vegetation increases DO, it is reducing CO2 at the same time which will result in an upward swing in PH; with the amount of the upswing dependent on several factors. My pond has High PH (8.3 to 8.4) already and very high alkalinity (250-300). I don't want to go from an "ok" PH situation to one with unacceptably high spikes in the afternoons just because I planted/allowed vegetation.

My questions:

1) Does emergent and/or marginal vegetation increase DO and reduce CO2 to the same degree as submerged?
2) I�ve been planning to try and get some submerged vegetation started for habitat and nutrient control. Is this a good idea, bad idea or �it depends� for my situation?�
3) Should I focus on emergent and marginal vegetation instead of submerged?

Any insight anyone can provide would be greatly appreciated!

Bill D.


[Linked Image]
Be Brave Enough to Suck at Something New!
Seville #440502 03/13/16 08:13 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,994
Likes: 1496
B
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Moderator
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
B Offline
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,994
Likes: 1496
With high alkalinity - total hardness there is a high buffering capacity to resist 'swings' of pH. pH will swing up and down depending on sunshine (pH up); night (pH down). At night plants produce CO2 which converts to an acid (carbonic acid) to lower pH. In sunshine carbonic acid is converted to carbonates pH goes up. The amount of buffering and plant activity determines how much the shift will be. Significant shifts of pH are not a concern in your pond chemistry. With your hardness, I doubt very much you will ever see a pH decrease to 7.0 in your pond due to even abundant submerged plant growth. In low alkalinity water expect greater shifts of pH.

Last edited by Bill Cody; 03/13/16 08:38 PM.

aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine -
America's Journal of Pond Management
Seville #440509 03/13/16 08:36 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,080
Likes: 1
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,080
Likes: 1
Thanks Bill. I will move forward with the plan, HOPEFULLY, get the desirable vegetation in place before the bad boys show up and takeover!


[Linked Image]
Be Brave Enough to Suck at Something New!
Seville #440520 03/13/16 09:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,386
B
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
Ambassador
Field Correspondent
Lunker
B Offline
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,386
PSA...Aliens have recently been reported to be hanging around elevator shafts.


Do nature a favor, spay/neuter your pets and any weird friends or relatives.
Seville #440527 03/13/16 09:36 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,080
Likes: 1
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 6,080
Likes: 1
No worries Bob. I've seen the same reports. I suspect it's just Sparkie in his infamous fishing garb! grin


[Linked Image]
Be Brave Enough to Suck at Something New!
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 303
A
A Offline
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 303
Originally Posted By: Bill Cody
With high alkalinity - total hardness there is a high buffering capacity to resist 'swings' of pH. pH will swing up and down depending on sunshine (pH up); night (pH down). At night plants produce CO2 which converts to an acid (carbonic acid) to lower pH. In sunshine carbonic acid is converted to carbonates pH goes up. The amount of buffering and plant activity determines how much the shift will be. Significant shifts of pH are not a concern in your pond chemistry. With your hardness, I doubt very much you will ever see a pH decrease to 7.0 in your pond due to even abundant submerged plant growth. In low alkalinity water expect greater shifts of pH.


Bill, I have the opposite problem: low alkalinity (37 last I checked) and low pH (around 6, even with lime on the bottom).

My pond is new with little or no plant life. Would water plants help me with the alkalinity/pH?


7ac 2015 CNBG RES FHM 2016 TP FLMB 2017 NLMB GSH L 2018 TP & 70 HSB PK 2019 TP RBT 2020 TFS TP 25 HSB 250 F1,L,RBT -206 2021 TFS TP GSH L,-312 2022 GSH TP CR TFS RBT -234, 2023 BG TP TFS NLMB, -160




Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Link Copied to Clipboard
Today's Birthdays
jkdolan, jkilmer83, lassig, Monty M, Randy H., Trent Aldridge
Recent Posts
Stop Feeding- Will Bass Return to Foraging ?
by Bill Cody - 09/16/26 09:37 AM
Gravel Pit Lake - Aeration ?
by WindowRock - 09/15/26 09:49 AM
Field and Stream Feeds?
by Bill Cody - 09/14/26 07:37 PM
Newbie from Colorado
by ewest - 09/14/26 03:34 PM
New Pond Update...
by ewest - 09/14/26 03:27 PM
Too much forage?
by Jst4Fun - 09/14/26 01:09 PM
Lotus variety of nice color
by gehajake - 09/13/26 02:07 PM
Billboard Tarp Pond
by jason7858 - 09/11/26 05:21 PM
LMB in 1 ac pond
by Terry Battisti - 09/11/26 04:10 PM
Previous lurker from Dayton, Ohio!
by ewest - 09/10/26 10:03 AM
Chestnut other trees for wildlife
by Scooter_Trash - 09/09/26 09:54 PM
Introduction
by Terry Battisti - 09/09/26 09:52 PM
Newly Uploaded Images
Uninvited crappie pictures
Uninvited crappie pictures
by fishwife, June 16
Chestnuts this afternoon
Chestnuts this afternoon
by Rangersedge, May 21
Trackhoe
Trackhoe
by Rangersedge, January 24
Thanksgiving RES
Thanksgiving RES
by Shorty, November 27
Nice 12 Inch BGxRES
Nice 12 Inch BGxRES
by Theo Gallus, June 1
F1 Bass stocked 6/24 caught 3/30/25
F1 Bass stocked 6/24 caught 3/30/25
by lafarmpondguy, March 31

� 2014 POND BOSS INC. all rights reserved USA and Worldwide

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1