|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,661
Members19,114
| |
Most Online13,012 Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18
Ambassador Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18 |
Try this for RES:
6"..... 1.6ozs 6.5".... 3.2ozs 7"...... 4.8ozs 7.5".... 4.8ozs 8"...... 6.4ozs 8.5".... 8.0ozs 9"...... 8.0ozs 9.5".... 9.6ozs 10".... 11.2ozs 10.5".. 12.8ozs 11".... 16.0ozs 11.5".. 17.6ozs 12".... 20.8ozs 12.5".. 22.4ozs 13".... 25.6ozs 13.5".. 28.8ozs 14".... 33.6ozs
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|