|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,661
Members19,114
| |
Most Online13,012 Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,103 Likes: 24
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame  Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame  Lunker
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,103 Likes: 24 |
No matter the politics or opinions on what the EPA is doing, the EPA has violated the law in exceeding it's authority and legislatively granted authority.
A "named" creek does not mean it is a navigable waterway. Nor does it mean it is a waterway used for commercial transportation of goods and/or services. That was a huge, illegal over reach by the EPA that the SCOTUS has ruled on multiple times....
The Wyoming Rancher will prevail in court, and be completely, financially destitute, thanks to an over-zealous EPA actions and the outright support, or inactions of people that think it (property rights and the constitution) just doesn't matter.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|