|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,671
Members19,115
| |
Most Online13,012
Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18
Ambassador Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18 |
Can't wait to see what you pull out of your pond, Al!! I'm hoping to see a 2 lber!!
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,577 Likes: 402
Moderator
|
|
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,577 Likes: 402 |
Can't wait to see what you pull out of your pond, Al!! I'm hoping to see a 2 lber!! Tony, my thought was "Can't wait to see what you pull out of your pond, Tony!! I'm hoping to see a 2 lber!!" It's almost funny how similar our paths have been over the last 2 years with two different fish. We're both close Buddy.
AL
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18
Ambassador Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18 |
I think I'm just as excited watching fellow pondmeisters edge up on that 2lb mark as I am watching my own fish.
I've had my eye on those Texas coppers for a good while now! I know you guys are closer than I am. Can hardly wait!
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
