|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,700
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 03:05 AM
|
|
|
8 members (J. E. Craig, gehajake, FishinRod, WindowRock, jludwig, emactxag, Theo Gallus, LeighAnn),
3,304
guests, and
542
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18
Ambassador Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18 |
Hope there's no fish in that rese!
Hollywood used the same technique to film underwater scenes during the making of "The Abyss"
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|