|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,672
Members19,115
| |
Most Online13,561
|
|
|
2 members (jludwig, 10x),
6,393
guests, and
120
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 904 Likes: 1
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 904 Likes: 1 |
I did something similar - I took an existing 2.5 acre pond and build a 5 acre pond around it essentially...I had the larger levee constructed downhill and let it partially fill then had a trackhoe break the dam of the small pond, letting all the fish run into the big one.
Worked well and had the added benefit of having a pretty cool structural aspect to the big pond - they shaved the old levee down so that it would be 3-4 feet under water at full pool of the new pond, and with the deep channel cut through the middle of it when they broke the dam, it's a really neat underwater structure that you can always count on having fish holding on it.
The only regret I have is not cleaning some of the decades of muck out of the old pond before it refilled as an arm of the new pond. I wish I'd done that to increase the depth of that channel. Otherwise it worked out just fine.
Dale "When tempted to fight fire with fire, remember that the Fire Department usually uses water." - anonymous
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|