So by virtue of evaporation, surface aeration gives us cooler water but less water overall remains in the pond, when compared to bottom aeration? (higher evap. rate)
So extrapolating even further and thinner, surface aeration in a drought ridden area where every drop counts, will contribute to daily water loss to a greater degree than bottom aeration will?
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
surface aeration in a drought ridden area where every drop counts, will contribute to daily water loss to a greater degree than bottom aeration will?
