|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,679
Members19,115
| |
Most Online23,413 5 hours ago
|
|
|
0 members (),
8,875
guests, and
271
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18
Ambassador Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18 |
I think a lot depends upon what level of interaction with your pond, regarding management, that you are willing to undertake. GSF are hardy, superb fighters on light tackle, make decent table fare, and are usually willing to cooperate, catch wise. In some instances they may tend to overpopulate and become stunted, but here again that has a lot to do with the management strategy in place.
Can you post a few pics of what you're catching?
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|