|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,707
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
7 members (Theo Gallus, FireIsHot, Sunil, ewest, CentexSaj, Jim Thompson, WindowRock),
2,587
guests, and
402
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 670
|
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 670 |
Jstiz,
Fwiw, the second year of my pond I had a little wpr, I left it that year. The third year I was afraid of it spreading so I treated it. 1/3 of the pond at a time over about 6 weeks. Everything looked great. Until the following year. FA began growing like crazy! I had none prior, but I had no other plants to take up excess nutrients. I wish I had done things differently. I may have treated some of it in strategic locations, but would not have gotten it all. I would rather deal with the primrose than the algae. I have planted some manageable shoreline plants and have some pond weed growing now and I believe that is helping use up some of the nutrients previously used by the primrose and the algae. You may have different results than I did, of course, because, say it with me, " it all depends".
Anyway, good luck and let us know what you decide and how it works for you.
CMM
CMM
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|