|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,707
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
7 members (Theo Gallus, FireIsHot, Sunil, ewest, CentexSaj, Jim Thompson, WindowRock),
2,587
guests, and
402
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,103 Likes: 24
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame  Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Field Correspondent Hall of Fame  Lunker
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,103 Likes: 24 |
My thoughts were left in a reply after reading the proposed BMP "idea". Looks like a thinly veiled attempt at an eventually regulatory sanctioned market share grab. I can not see how any BMP's could be developed on a national level. Climate, topography, geology, soils, owner goals.....all have vastly different needs on the most basic of construction techniques. I just can't see a one-size-fits-all plan being created, or accepted.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|