Forums36
Topics41,070
Posts559,166
Members18,570
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
12 members (FishinRod, SherWood, canyoncreek, Bigtrh24, Sunil, Augie, Justin W, catscratch, gehajake, azteca, TEC, Chadsnider),
701
guests, and
458
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,801 Likes: 69
Chairman, Pond Boss Legacy award; Moderator; field correspondent Lunker
|
Chairman, Pond Boss Legacy award; Moderator; field correspondent Lunker
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,801 Likes: 69 |
Lusk, et al prescribe dense shallow cover [1-6' depth] for forage [BG] population protection. Considering your goals [improved LMB WR], sheer size of BOW [100 ac], and amount of raw materials for structure [150 6-8' conifers] I'd focus efforts on shallow areas first. You're looking at placing 30 groups of 5 trees on over 4 million sq ft of water - so I'd lock down those shallow areas first. You're already seeing results from your previous structure implementation - improved LMB WR will likely result in conjunction with assertive culling efforts of low WR LMB. I think you're on the right track - give these efforts 2-3 seasons to reflect true impact. Keep taking L/W measurements and keep us apprised.
You did well with TFS from Grimes...he's a can't miss resource.
Many men go fishing all of their lives without knowing that it is not fish they are after. ~ Henry David Thoreau
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|