|
Forums36
Topics41,109
Posts559,623
Members18,589
| |
Most Online3,612
Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
|
14 members (catscratch, Fishingadventure, Boondoggle, Retired on 40, H20fwler, Sunil, lmoore, Tinylake, chin_monster, WiPondGuy, Theo Gallus, Catch N 8 NTex, Jhust, DeerTexas),
1,221
guests, and
273
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,315
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,315 |
Yes, but my thought is the pools would make the stream look bigger than it really is. Even though the total flow is small, the more pools it has, the bigger it will look. To go along with this idea of appearances. How about at one (or more) of those pools, you pump water into those. Still try to pump into the top one, but then also pump into the lower ones. When the water flows into the last one, it will look like a lot and be impressive. Much like a natural spring on top of a mountain. The further it goes down, the more other water joins in as it gets lower. It should keep the pumping costs down a bit too.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
