|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,673
Members19,115
| |
Most Online13,561 12 hours ago
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 37
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 37 |
Mr. Roehrig, The Ultimate pond rake head is smaller than the beachcomber rake because if it were the same size as the b.rake (3ft.) it would be difficult to lift from the water with all the vegetation on it. Also, the handle on the Ultimate pond rake was intentionally designed at a length of 5 ft. not only for shipping costs but to steer clear of a 2 pc. handle like the b. rake. Most people know that the weakest link of the b. rake is the handle (I've told the manufacturer this, too). Jason, you also mention moving parts. The only moving part the Ultimate rake has is the hydofoil which is operated by a cable. Could you clarify? As for price, I don't think this rake is priced too far out of line ($130.00) when compared to other rakes that some pond companies carry and mark up way out of line.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|