|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,676
Members19,115
| |
Most Online13,561 22 hours ago
|
|
|
0 members (),
5,001
guests, and
226
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18
Ambassador Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18 |
I would consider those numbers (LMB and CC) to be heavy also. However, with your stated goal being large HBG, those high predator numbers should certainly encourage good results. I would definitely harvest those CC as they can be real pellet hogs at feeding time, and might bully the HBG away from the feed.
Keep your eyes peeled for excessive aquatic vegetation, you will want to stay on top of things once it gets a foothold.
How much are you feeding every evening? (lbs ?)
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|