I'm in agreement with you on the subject of length, George. Taken by itself it just doesn't tell the whole story.

I've been eagerly following Al's progress (as well as your own), with the CNBG.....can't wait for photos of that two pounder!

"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"

If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.