|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,700
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18
Ambassador Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18 |
Thanks Chad. I still feel that limiting recruitment is key to managing HBG, which would render the topic of "what are these fish going to turn into?" a moot point. I wish hatcheries would spend more time educating their potential customers as to how to properly manage these fish, rather than trying to convince them that the dreaded GSF syndrome won't occur with "their" hybrids....I feel if these fish are managed properly, it won't be an issue with anyone's hybrids, regardless of parentage.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|