|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,707
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
7 members (Theo Gallus, FireIsHot, Sunil, ewest, CentexSaj, Jim Thompson, WindowRock),
2,587
guests, and
402
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14 |
I have read ample material discussing the "Dead Zone" bottom water in ponds as being an unproductive aspect of ponds. I am currently excavating a 2.5 acre Farm Pond in Upstate NY for both game fish (LMB & Bluegill) and irrigation. I planned on using a windmill driven bottom aerator to mitigate the effects of the low 02 bottom water but now wonder if this bottom "Dead Zone" might not include desirable nutrients that I can put to work for me. All the negative comments about the bottom layer having ammonia, nitrates, feces, etc sounds like a source of fertile irrigation water to me. Near the pond I plan on growing Pumkins and Fall Raspberries for a 'Pick Your Own' operation. Perhaps if I created a deep 'sump' in the middle of the pond and placed the aerator mid-depth @ 6' it would cause the currents to sweep the feces, etc into the sump for collection. Frequent pumping from this sump for irrigation should help keep muck and the 'undesirable factors' at a minimum. Does anyone have any experience taking advantage using bottom water for irrigation ? Would E.Coli from fish feces be present in the bottom "Dead Zone"?.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|