|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,707
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564
Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,315
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,315 |
Field ops:
Operation Cyanellus Rex now terminated. Operation Hybridflyer will commence shortly. Yolk, at first I thought you were in trouble. How in the world are you going to protect yourself from an air assault. Surely that is too big of an area to cover. And then it hit me, you don't have to worry because his HBG won't be able to live past the descent.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,255
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,255 |
] Yolk, at first I thought you were in trouble. How in the world are you going to protect yourself from an air assault. Surely that is too big of an area to cover. And then it hit me, you don't have to worry because his HBG won't be able to live past the descent.
I'm not really all that worried about his ground assault, either. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18
Ambassador Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18 |
I'm not really all that worried about his ground assault, either.
That's the spirit. No sense in losing sleep over the inevitable.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
