Originally Posted By: Yolk Sac
Beautiful pics, Sparkie.

Beneath that summertime layer of bearing grease and 30wt oil there lurks an artiste.

If I may offer a humble suggestion, I would title the first photo "Counterpoint", the reflected, airy grace and beauty of the lofty heavens being perfectly offset by the gaping maw, malevelent gaze, and misshapen countenance that marks even the diluted presence of cyanellus genetics.

Or, if you prefer modernism to the Baroque, I suppose you could go with "Still Life with Cloud and Mutation."














I'm flattered that you approve, Yolk, but I fear my own meager comprehension and interpretation skills cannot rival yours in situations where the art meets the eye. After all, it was just earlier this week when I was convinced that I saw Bruce Condello's smiling countenance looking back at me from within the slimy folds of a floating mat of FA. After a great deal of trouble, I was able to retrieve it and box it up. You should be receiving it any day now, please take a look and give me your honest evaluation.

It may be a little dry after transport, so feel free to place it into your pond and allow 48 hours for it to re-hydrate. It makes Bruce appear aged beyond the norm when it dries out.

I eagerly await your critique.

"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"

If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.