Thanks Lovnlivin for the good pictures.
Now I am questioning, as sprkplug pointed out, are we looking at the first gill arch in my picture?
If we are, it definitely was not a BCP. But if it was other than the first arch as your pictures show and Bill Cody pointed out, the "other than first arch" BCP gill rakers are shorter.
So if we are seeing the second row of gill rakers in my fish, it looks a lot closer to the second row in your picture.
I don't know enough yet to look at the right things to come up with good observations, so I did not get good enough pictures or examine the fish well enough.
This is turning into a "where's Waldo" type of deal. I appreciate everybody's input and time spent trying to figure out something I did not give very good information.
