|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,671
Members19,115
| |
Most Online13,012 Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
0 members (),
7,242
guests, and
126
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,011
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,011 |
Charlie,
You have an interesting situation. On one hand, I agree with Theo's point #3....you can never have enough topsoil. The interesting point, is your comment that the more topsoil you remove, the more water you hit. Here is one thought I had. Without knowing the goals of your pond and given your geographic location, I'm going under the premise that it will be a traditional bass/bg/catfish impoundment. This assumption may be a big mistake so please correct me if I'm wrong. It seems that a good portion of southern pond owners incorporate a fertilization program in their pond managment regime. For ponds that have high flow through, fertilization becomes more difficult. If your plan is to include a fertilization program, perhaps it would be prudent to limit the amount of water flowing into your pond by leaving the topsoil in place, thus reducing the amount of water/number of springs.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|