|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,666
Members19,114
| |
Most Online13,012 Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
2 members (Bill Cody, LeighAnn),
1,729
guests, and
135
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18
Ambassador Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18 |
Second attempt....
First photo....RES x BG....RES dominant trait Second photo....RES x BG...RES dominant trait....female?
Third and fourth photos....if I were to see this photos without knowing anything about where, or how they came to be, I would probably call em' RES and never look back.
But, perhaps the gape is slightly larger than what you would expect from a pure RES, and maybe I do see a lighter edge on the anal fins....
Big help, huh?
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|