I'm not remotely qualified to comment on aeration, but I did pick up on a couple things by watching and listening to Ted and Sue on Saturday, and I now realize more than ever that the science of proper aeration is just that...a science. Watching Ted and Highflyer checking the data, and verifying the conditions under which the testing was done, was an eye-opener for me. There's a lot that goes into making those bubbles, or at least there needs to be in order for it to be done correctly.

I was also impressed with the reasons behind the testing. At no time did I ever hear anyone say that homebuilt systems were always inadequate, or a bad idea....the concern was that one needed to source the correct components for a DIY system, including consulting with a pro for advice on the matter. It's simply not enough to make bubbles, nor is the appearance of bubbles on the surface a good indicator that all is well. My perception was that the parties involved were simply trying to ensure that PondBoss continues to provide the best information possible, from all sides, in order to help everyone make the best possible decisions.


"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"

If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.