|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,661
Members19,114
| |
Most Online13,012 Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,507 Likes: 24
Lunker
|
|
Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,507 Likes: 24 |
"Use herbacide if you must, but please as an absolute last resort."
JW: Granted, there are several options - besides herbicides - for managing unwanted aquatic plants (aka "weeds"). However, I believe that herbicides should rarely be considered a "last resort" option.
A herbicide's predictable impact on a large, out-of-control plant population may sometimes cause more net-damage than benefit, as could virtually any remedial action that produces a rapid and drastic alteration in an aquatic ecosystem.
Aquatic herbicides are a safe and viable plant management tool (option) in the hands of experienced, knowledgeable applicators - or under the guidance of same. However, even I question their appropriateness in some "last resort" situations.
Kelly Duffie Cypress, TX
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 28
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 28 |
Kelly,
Ok, "last resort" did not accurately convey my thoughts. I think that people have lost patience and tend to want whatever will give them the quickest or cheapest resolution to their problems.
I guess the point I was trying to make is based on my desire not to use Herbicides unless I don't have any other "reasonable" options.
Now, I am not as single minded as Howard "The Dirt Doctor" Garrett!
For me, I am just willing to spend more money and more time on a non chemical solution.
I do agree with you that "...any remedial action that produces a rapid and drastic alteration in an aquatic ecosystem" can cause more damage than benefit.
I just prefer not to use herbacides and encourage others to do the same.
Cheers,
JW
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|