|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,682
Members19,115
| |
Most Online23,413 Yesterday at 08:18 AM
|
|
|
2 members (AbqBrian, Pond Star),
21,669
guests, and
134
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,999 Likes: 1498
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,999 Likes: 1498 |
g.head - Your copper build-up question has no one answer for every pond. It will vary from pond to pond and region to region. Generally speaking the lower the water hardness the quicker Cu build-up will be a problem. It will also depend on how aerobic your sediments are. As I understand it, the more aerobic the sediments are the more likely the copper will dissolve from bound or stable state out of the sediments. There has not been a lot of published research on this topic that I am aware of.
The amount of copper a pond can absorb will also be dependant on its size (pounds Cu /acre). Sediments have the ability to absorb a definative amount of copper. Once that level has been reached the where can newly added doses of Cupper go if the sediments are saturated?
aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine - America's Journal of Pond Management
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|