|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,700
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564
Yesterday at 03:05 AM
|
|
|
7 members (Sunil, WindowRock, Theo Gallus, catscratch, J. E. Craig, gehajake, FishinRod),
2,861
guests, and
605
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18
Ambassador Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18 |
As a side note, (and if I remember correctly), a MBG x FRES, AS WELL AS a MRES x FBG (reciprocal cross) will both yield a very high percentage, and nearly equal amounts, of males....
Unlike the reciprocal cross of MGSF x FBG, which produces many more females than 'traditional' HBG.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1)
And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1)
Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT?
PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
