|
Forums36
Topics42,114
Posts571,691
Members19,115
| |
Most Online45,564 12 hours ago
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 29,788 Likes: 1295
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent  Lunker
|
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent  Lunker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 29,788 Likes: 1295 |
I use dye in the HBG pond and I'm sold on it. perhaps its use might depend upon the goals and management practices in place? I think the trend is to typically think of all ponds in a balanced light, but I wonder if there are in fact situations where dye is preferred over a natural bloom.....
"Unbalanced ponds", where the goals and practices favor one or two species, and management is hands-on and somewhat specialized, might do well with dye when compared to a natural bloom. Some ponds may not require the emphasis on establishing or maintaining a natural food chain that a balanced pond will, nor do they require the amount of natural vegetative cover, or structure.
Not to mention...I've yet to see a "dye bloom" crash and contribute to a fish kill. I agree with you. In ponds that have a high population of hybrid fish, where you don't depend on YOY recruitment for forage fish, I prefer dye vs. a bloom. Plus there's the possibility of the phytoplankton dying off and FA taking over, or the macrophytes running amok like Cecil said. This is another one of those "it all depends" moments.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|