|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,702
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564
Sep 20th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 15
Fingerling
|
|
Fingerling
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 15 |
We've completed installing (2) auto fish feeders on my 12 acre lake. The BG's are eating but I don't see many of them. Certainly not like the video's from Texas Hunter and others where it looks like the water is boiling. So we are thinking of supplemental stocking of BG's. Question is would FHM's be a better choice? They are cheaper. Should we do both? Not sure how many to put in either. Can FHM's ever be a better choice than BG's? All responses appreciated.
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
BG's vs. FHM, which to stock?
|
BassPRO
|
08/22/12 04:38 PM
|
|
Re: BG's vs. FHM, which to stock?
|
esshup
|
08/22/12 04:43 PM
|
|
Re: BG's vs. FHM, which to stock?
|
jludwig
|
08/22/12 04:44 PM
|
|
Re: BG's vs. FHM, which to stock?
|
BassPRO
|
08/22/12 04:53 PM
|
|
Re: BG's vs. FHM, which to stock?
|
esshup
|
08/22/12 05:02 PM
|
|
Re: BG's vs. FHM, which to stock?
|
ewest
|
08/22/12 05:52 PM
|
|
Re: BG's vs. FHM, which to stock?
|
catmandoo
|
08/22/12 05:59 PM
|
|
Re: BG's vs. FHM, which to stock?
|
greatwhiteape
|
08/22/12 10:11 PM
|
|
Re: BG's vs. FHM, which to stock?
|
Wade B.
|
08/26/12 02:58 AM
|
|
Re: BG's vs. FHM, which to stock?
|
greatwhiteape
|
08/30/12 09:02 PM
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57 |
|
