|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,113
Posts571,665
Members19,114
| |
Most Online13,012 Jun 7th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,995 Likes: 1496
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,995 Likes: 1496 |
Interesting concept of larger bubbles maintaining a larger ice free area. Larger bubbles will create more 'apparent' activity at the surface. I'd like to see results from a test of the two diffuser styles. My logic concludes that you will get a larger ice free area from the diffuser that produces the most water flow, which is what is deterring the ice formation; flow or current. The farther the current spreads the larger the ice free area becomes assuming a constant temperature.
Larger bubbles seem to make more activity at the surface but the current or volume flow across & under the surface will be less than with finer or smaller bubbles. Try the hose only this year and save your money to buy a membrane or stone diffuser next year and compare. Let us know your results. 0.75 cfm will run only one 6" airstone. You will get better results from an 8-10" dia membrane disk. Stones have to be cleaned in acid whereas edpm or rubber membranes can be scrubbed with a brush or scouring pad & water.
aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine - America's Journal of Pond Management
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|