Forums36
Topics41,062
Posts559,066
Members18,564
|
Most Online3,612 Jan 10th, 2023
|
|
15 members (Theeck, Fishingadventure, Boondoggle, John Kruid, ArkieJig, Tinylake, catscratch, tim k, 4CornersPuddle, Rick O, Sunil, Bigtrh24, JoeDK, rjackson, Knobber),
572
guests, and
449
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,167 Likes: 496
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
|
Moderator Ambassador Field Correspondent Lunker
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,167 Likes: 496 |
Interesting concept of larger bubbles maintaining a larger ice free area. Larger bubbles will create more 'apparent' activity at the surface. I'd like to see results from a test of the two diffuser styles. My logic concludes that you will get a larger ice free area from the diffuser that produces the most water flow, which is what is deterring the ice formation; flow or current. The farther the current spreads the larger the ice free area becomes assuming a constant temperature.
Larger bubbles seem to make more activity at the surface but the current or volume flow across & under the surface will be less than with finer or smaller bubbles. Try the hose only this year and save your money to buy a membrane or stone diffuser next year and compare. Let us know your results. 0.75 cfm will run only one 6" airstone. You will get better results from an 8-10" dia membrane disk. Stones have to be cleaned in acid whereas edpm or rubber membranes can be scrubbed with a brush or scouring pad & water.
aka Pond Doctor & Dr. Perca Read Pond Boss Magazine - America's Journal of Pond Management
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|