|
|
|
Forums36
Topics42,115
Posts571,702
Members19,116
| |
Most Online45,564 Sep 20th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18
Ambassador Lunker
|
|
Ambassador Lunker
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,981 Likes: 18 |
I just watched my Dad catch three one-pound bluegill, and one redear that was 1-2. One of the greatest nights of my life. Too bad that a hailstorm kicked us off the lake. The Quarry Lake had tons of 7-8 inch bluegill when we came here 2.5 years ago. The relative weights of the fish were 75-80. Now we have bluegill with relative weights of 105-110 from our feeding program and introduction of CSBG genetics. It's really fun to watch. Awesome! I love that feeling you get when you see all the hard work starting to pay off. Makes it all worthwhile.
"Forget pounds and ounces, I'm figuring displacement!"
If we accept that: MBG(+)FGSF(=)HBG(F1) And we surmise that: BG(>)HBG(F1) while GSF(<)HBG(F1) Would it hold true that: HBG(F1)(+)AM500(x)q.d.(=)1.5lbGRWT? PB answer: It depends.
|
|
|
Moderated by Bill Cody, Bruce Condello, catmandoo, Chris Steelman, Dave Davidson1, esshup, ewest, FireIsHot, Omaha, Sunil, teehjaeh57
|
|
|
|